Sex chat id from chatting
The dismissal was upheld by the Indiana Court of Appeals in February and transferred to the Supreme Court this May. "The Dissemination Statute clearly protects minors under the age of 18 from the dissemination of matter harmful to them," Justice Mark S. "Whether this inconsistent statutory treatment of minors aged 16 and 17 is advisable with respect to sexually-related activity is a matter for the legislature, and whether Thakar’s alleged conduct violated the Dissemination Statute is a matter for the jury."Authorities say Thakar sent a nude picture of himself to an Oregon girl who he knew was only 16. The court in that case held that the statute was unconstitutionally vague because the activity wouldn't be considered "patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable matter for or performance before minors," which Massa said is a necessary element of the definition "harmful to minors" under state law.
But in the opinion issued Monday, all five Indiana justices agreed that the state's dissemination statue was clear in its terms.
Besides which, we don't know which end of the conversation was in which state. What if that's where the girl is and our poster is in CO?
fast forward to the time she said she was going to be turning 18 and she gets weird, then she admits she is 15, at this point i told her i could no longer talk to her, she kept pleading and pleading and i said no, then she stopped talking so i figured it was over and done, then she text back saying she was in the hospital and had some cancer and that her dad keeps beating her and i am a good person i just wanted her to have someone to talk to, so i let her keep talking but was nothing sexual in nature after finding out her age.
You need to get a copy of any text messages sent between the two of you.
If she represented herself as a 18, then anything exchange between that period and the time that you learned she was 17 is of no consequence because in order to convict it needs to be shown that you knew, or should have known the person was underage. Furnishing harmful items to minors; internet activity; classification; definitions A.
An adult can legally have sex with a 16- or 17-year-old in Indiana, but sending a nude photo to a teen of the same age is illegal, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled. Thakar, of Fishers, will face trial on one felony count of disseminating matter harmful to a minor, a charge originally dismissed last year. The FBI notified the Fishers Police Department of the incident.
A trial court dismissed the charges in May 2016 on the basis that the state's dissemination statute was vague because the age of consent to sexual activity in Indiana is 16. Thakar admitted to Fishers police that he had a problem chatting online and said he knew why investigators were asking about the girl from Oregon, according to court documents. State, in which the defendant argued that it was "patently illogical" that a man could legally expose himself to a consenting 16-year-old in person but not via photograph.